“Long-Term Debt: An Unsustainable Future.”

August 27, 2013|

We recently watched this video from Peter G. Peterson Foundation and found it very interesting.

Although small steps in the right direction have been taken, we still face major long-term challenges ahead that will need serious thought and compromise. How do you anticipate tackling national debt?

[youtube id=”J9KtyBKqkho” width=”600″ height=”350″]

Being Street Smart by Sy Harding

August 15, 2013|

Withdrawal From Stimulus Addiction Will Be Difficult.

Markets around the world panicked in May when Fed Chairman Bernanke hinted that the Fed could begin dialing back QE stimulus as early as its June meeting. Oh no! That June meeting was only a month away. The FT World ex-U.S. Index plunged 13% over the next four weeks. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index (19 countries) plunged 14%. Even the S&P 500 in the U.S. declined 6% to the June 22 low.

At that point Chairman Bernanke also seemed to panic, rushing out with his assurances that he didn’t mean the Fed would taper back stimulus that soon, just that it could, but that it probably would not until later in the year.

With those assuring words, the U.S. market rallied back not only to its May peak, but the S&P 500 rallied to a new high 2% above that peak.

However, here we are in August with the Fed now expected to begin tapering at its September meeting, and if not, for sure in October. But are investors again saying oh no, September is only a month away?

So far, not in the U.S. anyway.

However, the FT World ex-U.S. Index rolled over to the downside again a week ago, and is now 5% below its May peak, while the MSCI Emerging Markets Index’s rally off Bernanke’s June assurances failed two weeks ago when tapering talk resumed, and it is now 12% below its May peak.

So the disconnect between the enthusiasm and confidence of U.S. investors and those elsewhere in the world continues.

Global markets seem to expect the withdrawal from the addiction to massive amounts of U.S. stimulus will be difficult for the world’s largest economy, while Wall Street is assuring U.S. investors that it won’t be a problem. After all, the Fed will still be providing stimulus. It will only be tapering back on the amount it provides, maybe from the current $85 billion a month to $65 billion, then $50 billion, $40 billion, not planning to be back to zero stimulus until sometime in 2014.

Here’s the problem.

The massive amounts of fiscal and monetary stimulus in 2008 and 2009 worked to prevent the ‘great recession’ from worsening into another great depression. But increasing amounts of stimulus have been needed since just to keep the economy’s head barely above water. QE1 was followed by QE2’s $30 billion of monthly stimulus, which was followed by QE3’s $40 billion, which was followed by ‘QE to infinity’ in December of last year, in which the stimulus was raised to $85 billion a month.

Even with that the U.S. economy has been stumbling, global markets even more so, quite a number back in recessions. The massive stimulus efforts by global central banks clearly did not provide a permanent cure for the underlying problems, and more problematic, just maintaining the status quo has required increased dosages of stimulus.

It’s like a patient with serious medical conditions being prescribed oxycodone to relieve the pain while a series of time-consuming procedures are planned to fix the condition. If the procedures don’t work out, the patient will wake up with the conditions not being cured plus an addiction to oxycodone, withdrawal from which brings additional problems.

That seems to be the situation with the global economic situation. It has required increasing dosages of stimulus to keep the pain only somewhat at bay. And now other problems, like record government debt, require that the dosages be tapered back, even as the economy is unable to maintain the status quo without increasing dosages. Withdrawal pains will be unavoidable.

Meanwhile, lingering in the background uncorrected, are the conditions that created the previous meltdowns, greedy and uncontrolled financial institutions, and lack of concern by those in charge of doing something about it.

For now anyway, U.S. investors seem to have very short memories. They don’t seem to remember why the previous possibility of tapering scared them in May, while global markets not only remember that, but also remember the terrible long-term record central banks have in trying to bring economies in for soft landings.

Congress has already begun withdrawing fiscal stimulus, cutting back on government spending and raising taxes this year. That the Fed will also taper back the monetary stimulus the economy has so clearly needed continuously more of, not less, is not a promising situation.

Sy Harding is president of Asset Management Research Corp, and editor of www.StreetSmartReport.com, and the free market blog, www.streetsmartpost.com. He can also be followed on Twitter @streetsmartpost

Sy was Timer Digest’s #1 Gold Timer for 2012 (Gold Timer of the Year) and #2 Long-Term Stock Market Timer.

“Social Security — just say ‘no’” via Bankrate.com

August 13, 2013|

Originally posted by Jennie L. Phipps on Bankrate.com

It’s my birthday. I’m 62 and old enough to claim Social Security. But I’m not filing. Here are four reasons why it’s not part of my retirement planning.

Claiming early means I’d take a haircut. Taking Social Security before full retirement age — 66 for people born between 1934 and 1954 — reduces the monthly benefit by 25 percent.

I don’t need it. Seventeen years ago this month, I used my unemployment to keep the family afloat while I started my own business. In the last couple of years, I’ve been racheting down the amount of time I spend working, but I like what I do and I’m not ready to hang up my work boots.

Working and claiming add up to missing money. If I file for Social Security before my full retirement age of 66 and keep working — earning more than $15,120 — Social Security will subtract $1 from my benefit payments for every $2 I earn. Once I reach my full retirement age, Social Security will recalculate my benefit to reflect the earlier payments I didn’t get, but I’d rather keep my paycheck, thanks. Plus, once I reach 66, I can work and earn all I want and my Social Security won’t be affected at all.

Patience pays off. The magic age is 66. That’s when people my age can claim full Social Security and take advantage of claiming choices. Here’s the strategy I’m considering. Because I’m married, at 66, I’ll be able to restrict my claim to half my spouse’s Social Security and let the value of my own grow 8 percent a year, plus cost-of-living adjustments, until I can claim the maximum amount at age 70. Using this strategy increases what I’ll get in benefits compared to claiming at 66 or delaying altogether until 70 by more than $70,000 by the time I’m 85 — more if I live longer than average, according to calculations by Social Security Income Planner, a sophisticated Social Security benefit calculator.

One last thing: I used to think 62 was over the hill, but I was wrong. At 62, I still feel like I’m only halfway up.